Texanglican

"The Preachers chiefly shall take heed that they teach nothing in their preaching, which they would have the people religiously to observe and believe, but that which is agreeable to the Doctrine of the Old Testament and the New, and that which the Catholick Fathers and Ancient Bishops have gathered out of that Doctrine." A proposed canon of Elizabeth I, 1571

My Photo
Name:
Location: Bedford, Texas, United States

I am a presbyter in the diocese of Fort Worth, Texas (Anglican Church in North America). I serve as Chaplain at St. Vincent's School and as a canon of St. Vincent's Cathedral Church in Bedford, Texas. In addition to my parish duties and teaching Religion classes in the school I am also the Middle School Social Studies teacher.

Thursday, November 18, 2004

Anglican theological variety

It occurs to me that there may be some friends reading this blog who are mystified by the frequent discussions of internal Anglican affairs. For those who aren’t familiar with Anglican practice, a brief word on the variety within our Communion might be in order. Anglican clergy and the parishes they serve can generally be broken down into three “parties.” There is the “High Church” or Anglo-Catholic tradition (probably 80% of our priests and parishes here in Fort Worth fall into this group), the Evangelical or “Low Church” tradition (about 20% of our diocesan clergy), and the “Broad Church” or Latitudinarian custom. These “Broad Church” types are today in the US mostly on the theologically liberal end of the spectrum, and here in Fort Worth we really don’t have very many—or perhaps any—of them, but they are the dominant voice in ECUSA nationally. It was once the case that Anglo-Catholics and Evangelicals were at odds on many points, especially about worship practice and equipment (Anglo-Catholics are into “smells and bells” on the ceremonial side and emphasize the “Real Presence of Christ” in the Blessed Sacrament of the altar, while Low Churchmen tend to prefer simplicity in worship and emphasize the homily in a Morning Prayer context). But as the Broad Church party began drifting farther and farther to the left theologically, High and Low Churchmen began to realize that they had more in common theologically with each other (esp. in their common high regard for the authority of Holy Scripture and the creeds of the Church) than they did with their Broad Church brothers, who typically thought of themselves as “reasonable” types in the "middle." IMHO, the dominant “Broad Church” party in ECUSA today has more in common with theological liberals in such “progressive” Protestant denominations as the UCC and the Disciples of Christ (though admittedly with a “higher” liturgical sensibility than is typical in those congregationalist denominations) than they do with Anglo-Catholics and Evangelicals within the Anglican Communion. The recent much-publicized troubles in world-wide Anglicanism stem from this disconnect within the Anglican family between “classical” Anglo-Catholics and Evangelicals and the “progressive” leadership of ECUSA. I hope this brief discussion helps. You can't tell the players without a program!


2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ah, nice.

8:05 AM  
Anonymous baster said...

I think though the word Anglican usually refers to those churches in communion with the Archbishop of Canterbury, many Continuing Anglican bodies in the United States use the term Anglican to both assert their heritage and also to differentiate themselves from the Episcopal Church.
need to purchase research papers

4:38 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


View My Stats